The papers review process is a double-blind one, the review being done simultaneously by a minimum of two members of the international scientific committee. The review criteria considered are the novelty and originality of the paper, the quality of research methodology, the organization and clarity, the reference to prior work, and the quality of results. The result of the review process can be accept, accept with revision, or reject. Authors will be informed of the outcome of the review process. Only articles accepted by the scientific committee will be published.
Paperless, web-based peer review system, professional and helpful suggestions from reviewers. Articles in this journal have undergone a rigorous blind peer review system, based on initial editor screening and involving international refereeing, ensures that articles meet the highest standards of quality.
It facilitates our scholars, researchers, scientists, professors, corporate, governmental research agencies, librarians etc., in a more positive way in their research proceedings. The following is the editorial workflow that every manuscript submitted to the Journal undergoes during the course of the peer-reviewing process.
Peer Review Flow Chart